Fairfield First Selectman Bill Gerber is asking residents to attend an Energy/Telecommunications meeting of the Connecticut Siting Council (CSC) via Zoom on June 12 at 1 p.m. Agenda items are available on the council’s website. Here is the link to the join Zoom meeting
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/81351401216?pwd=nOfM3dat3At4vty5tabjoTcz2FYj8a.1
“This meeting may determine United Illuminating’s proposal to install massive monopoles and new transmission lines through Southport, Fairfield, and Bridgeport,” he said.
The Town of Fairfield, the City of Bridgeport, the Sasco Creek Neighbors Environmental Trust (SCNETI), the Southport Congregational Church and BJ’s Wholesale Club fought this plan in court and were awarded a victory when it was remanded back to the Siting Council.
UI proposed building this project on the south side of the Metro-North Railroad tracks—a plan that would have required over 19 acres of permanent easements from homes, businesses, churches, historic properties, and the towns themselves.
“But instead of approving or denying that application, the CSC took an unprecedented step: they approved a completely different project on the north side of the tracks—one that UI never designed or submitted,” said Gerber. “This alternative route posed similar impacts, but with no opportunity for affected property owners to weigh in.”
In April, the Connecticut Superior Court ruled in favor of Fairfield, Bridgeport and grassroots organization and said the CSC must change course.
United Illuminating spokesperson Sarah Wall Fliotsos has said the company remains committed to the project’s goals and is eager to put forth its plan for the Siting Council’s consideration
Gerber is calling for UI to submit a new application that considers alternatives and allows for public input.
“We are concerned, however, that the CSC may attempt to revive the original south side route, which would be devastating for residents, small businesses, local churches and historic districts, the town character, economy and property rights.
“Our legal position is clear: The only lawful option is for the CSC to require UI to submit a new application that properly considers alternatives and allows for full public input.”
